Aim. The prognostic value of the TNM and pTNM classifications currently use
d for tumours of the oral cavity is unsatisfactory. A better classification
should he aimed at as today's definition of T4 leads to overclassification
of many tumours and today's definition of N3 results in too few lymph node
s in this group. Until 1987 the grade of fixation of lymph-nodes was part o
f the N-classification for oral cancer as it is currently used in the N-cla
ssification of breast cancer.
Methods. From 1987 to 1991 the DOSAK tumour registry has stored 1532 primar
y cases of cancer of the oral cavity from 23 hospitals, Crosstables were ap
plied to outline the classification rule for clinical and histopathological
T and N based on important factors (T: tumour diameter and thickness; N: l
ymph node diameter and grade of fixation; pT: histopathological tumour diam
eter and thickness; pN: number of lymph nodes involved by the tumour), A Co
x model was calculated and combinations of similar prognostic estimates wer
e summarized to the same clinical and histopathological T and N. It was aim
ed at separating categories and achieving equivalent clinical and histopath
ological T classifications and group frequencies. In a final step a clinica
l and histopathological stage grouping can be proposed.
Results. The gradation of the survival rates shows a marked separation betw
een the T, N and stage categories. The distribution of T, N and stage categ
ories was more uniform when applying the new classification. (C) 1999 Europ
ean Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.