Altered bone metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease: there is a difference between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Citation
S. Ardizzone et al., Altered bone metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease: there is a difference between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, J INTERN M, 247(1), 2000, pp. 63-70
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546820 → ACNP
Volume
247
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
63 - 70
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6820(200001)247:1<63:ABMIIB>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objectives. The aims of this study were to assess bone metabolism in inflam matory bowel disease (IBD) patients and to evaluate potential differences b etween Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) with respect to the mechanisms underlying bone loss in this group of diseases. Design and setting, This was a cross-sectional study which started in 1992. Patients were randomly selected for invitation to participate and were exa mined during the years 1992-95 in one research clinic in Milan. Subjects and methods. Fifty-one patients suffering from CD (30 women and 21 men, mean age 38.7 +/- 13.2 years) and 40 with UC (15 women and 25 men, me an age 34.4. +/- 12.5 years) entered the study. Thirty healthy subjects wer e selected as sex- and age-matched controls (C). Spine and femoral neck bon e mineral density (expressed as T score), calciotropic hormones (parathyroi d hormone, PTH; 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, 25(OH)D-3; 1,25-hydroxycholecalc iferol, 1,25(OH)D-3) and biochemical markers of bone turnover (ostecalcin, OC: total alkaline phosphatase, ALP; type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide , ICTP) were evaluated. Results, Spine and femur T scores were similar in the two groups (spine: CD = -1.49 +/- 1.46; UC = -1.67 +/- 1.13; femur: CD = -1.80 +/- 1.36; UC = -1 .60 +/- 1.03), Based upon the WHO guidelines, only 8% of CD patients and 15 % of UC patients had a normal bone mineral density (BMD), 55% (CD) and 67% (UC) were osteopenic, and 37% (CD) and 18% (UC) were osteoporotic. The dist ribution amongst the three different diagnostic groups was not significantl y different between CD and UC groups (P = 0.11). PTH and 25(OH)D-3 concentr ations were not significantly different between CD and UC patients and cont rols, whilst 1.25(OH)D-3 concentrations were significantly lower in both CD and UC patients compared with controls (P < 0.05). Bone turnover was incre ased in UC but not in CD patients, as shown by significantly increased conc entrations in UC patients of both OC (CD = 7.77 +/- 5.06, UC = 10.03 +/- 6. 24, C = 6.58 +/- 2.87, P < 0.05 vs. C) and ICTP (CD = 5.74 +/- 3.94, UC = 1 0.2 +/- 8.47, C = 3.48 +/- 0.95, P < 0.05 vs. CD and C). In a stepwise regr ession that included age, sex, disease duration and cumulative prednisolone dose as independent variables, the femur T score was significantly inverse ly related to disease duration (r(2) = 0.115, F = 6.06) in CD patients. In UC patients, the spine T score was inversely related to age (r(2) = 0.107, F = 5.49) and significantly related to sex (more negative in males: r(2) = 0.3, F = 16.1); the femur T score was significantly related to sex (more ne gative in males) and inversely related to the cumulative prednisolone dose (r(2) = 0.283, F = 7.3). Conclusions. These data show that IBD patients have a diffuse osteopenia, t he degree of which is not different in CD and UC; however, bone turnover is significantly higher in UC. Finally, osteopenia is related to disease dura tion in CD, whilst it is related to the male sex and glucocorticoid treatme nt in UC.