Discriminant function analysis has been used to assess morphological distin
ctiveness of putatively different taxa. We used randomizations of previousl
y published morphological data for 2 subspecies of the coyote, Canis latran
s frustror and C. l. thamnos, to quantify a recognized but previously unexa
mined bias in discriminant-function analyses that use resubstitution classi
fication. This bias results in overestimates of intertaxon distinctiveness
and is exacerbated when sample sizes are small. An alternative classificati
on technique, jackknife sampling, is relatively unbiased.