Ra. Wolff et al., Propidium iodide compares favorably with histology and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride in the assessment of experimentally-induced infarct size, J MOL CEL C, 32(2), 2000, pp. 225-232
Quantitative assessment of infarct size after histology processing or by te
trazolium staining requires long reperfusion times to facilitate the deline
ation of the injured tissue. We evaluated the nucleic acid stain propidium
iodide as an alternate technique for assessment of infarct size because it
does not require extended reperfusion and is accomplished with more simple
tissue processing.
Eight mice underwent 45 min of coronary artery occlusion and 24 h of reperf
usion, after which propidium iodide was administered and allowed to circula
te for 15 min. Hearts were excised, sliced into transverse slices approxima
tely 620 mu m thick, and photographed for determination of infarction with
propidium iodide. Slices were processed by standard histology techniques, a
nd infarction was evaluated using classical criteria of necrosis. In four o
ther mice, infarct size was assessed by both triphenyl tetrazolium chloride
and propidium iodide staining. A total of 46 slices were analysed and infa
rction was described as a percentage of the cross-sectional area of the sli
ce.
The correlation (r = 0.94), orthogonal regression line (y = 0.9x + 1.8), an
d the percentage of the cross-section infarcted (histology 17.5 +/- 3.0% v
propidium iodide 18.5 +/- 3.0%), demonstrates that infarct size assessment
after propidium iodide staining or histology processing yields the same res
ults. Similarly, propidium iodide measurement of infarct size was comparabl
e to that obtained with TCC staining (22.5 +/- 4.1%, v 25.4 +/- 5.4%, respe
ctively, r = 0.84). We conclude that propidium iodide staining yields accur
ate infarct size assessment and is a simpler alternative to tetrazolium sta
ining or histologic processing. (C) 2000 Academic Press.