This paper examines how the issue of political support affects the design o
f social insurance. It distinguishes between redistributive character and s
ize of social protection. Three main results emerge. First, it may be appro
priate to adopt a system which is less redistributive than otherwise optima
l, in order to ensure political support for an adequate level of coverage i
n the second (voting) stage. Second, supplementary private insurance may in
crease the welfare of the poor, even if it is effectively bought only by th
e rich. Third, the case for prohibiting (supplementary) private insurance m
ay become stronger when the efficiency of private insurance markets increas
es. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved. JEL classification:
H23: D72; H50.