Incidence of neurapraxia in digital nerve injuries

Citation
A. Siddiqui et al., Incidence of neurapraxia in digital nerve injuries, J RECON MIC, 16(2), 2000, pp. 95-98
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY
ISSN journal
0743684X → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
95 - 98
Database
ISI
SICI code
0743-684X(200002)16:2<95:IONIDN>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Hand surgeons presented with a hand or Finger laceration and an abnormal st atic two-point discrimination (greater than or equal to 10 mm) must determi ne which patients require surgical exploration. There appears to be a pauci ty of data in the literature defining the incidence and nature of neuraprax ia in this setting. A study was conducted in a busy urban practice to bette r understand this problem. To determine the incidence of intact nerves (i.e., neurapraxia) in digital nerve injury patients, the authors reviewed experience with 152 patients wh o presented with isolated digital nerve injuries over a 33-month period. Pr eoperative return of sensation and negative exploration cases were combined and referred to as the trauma-induced neurapraxia (TIN) group. There were 18 non-repair cases among the 152 isolated digital nerve injuries, giving a 12 percent incidence of TIN. Sensory recovery among the TIN patients range d from 12 days to 6 months. In this study, the authors defined a group of patients who did not require surgical repair for isolated digital nerve injury as TIN cases. The TIN gro up represented 12 percent of the digital nerve trauma patients and required long follow-up for sensory recovery. This information is an important part of patient education and informed consent.