R. Picada et al., Postoperative deep wound infection in adults after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: Incidence and management, J SPINAL D, 13(1), 2000, pp. 42-45
The authors reviewed 817 instrumented lumbosacral fusions in adults and fou
nd an incidence of 3.2% deep wound infections. The primary focus of this st
udy was the management of these infections, with particular attention to wh
ether the implants needed to be removed. A consulting infectious disease sp
ecialist indicated that an acute infection of a low back fusion wound could
not be healed without removal of the metallic implants. This opinion was i
n contrast to the authors' daily experience and prompted this study. The au
thors identified and reviewed 817 cases of instrumented posterior lumbosacr
al arthrodeses in adults. A detailed analysis of any case with a deep wound
infection was performed and yielded and infection rate of 3.2% (26 patient
s). Of these, 24 achieved a clean, closed wound without removal of instrume
ntation through a protocol of aggressive debridement and secondary closure.
Instrumentation removal is not necessary to obtain a clean, closed wound u
sing an aggressive approach with early diagnosis, vigorous debridement in t
he operative room under general anesthesia, delayed primary or secondary cl
osure, and appropriate antibiotic coverage.