This paper studies strategic games in which the beliefs of each player are
represented by a set of probability measures satisfying a parametric specia
lization that is called epsilon-contamination. That is, beliefs an represen
ted by a set of probability measures, where every measure in the set has th
e form (1 - epsilon)p* + epsilon p, p* being the benchmark probability meas
ure, p being a contamination, and epsilon reflecting the amount of error in
p* that is deemed possible. Under a suitably modified common Frier assumpt
ion, if beliefs about opponents' action choices are common knowledge, then
beliefs satisfy some properties that can be interpreted as agreement and st
ochastic independence. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.