The effect of selection for growth rate on carcass composition and meat characteristics of rabbits

Citation
M. Piles et al., The effect of selection for growth rate on carcass composition and meat characteristics of rabbits, MEAT SCI, 54(4), 2000, pp. 347-355
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
MEAT SCIENCE
ISSN journal
03091740 → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
347 - 355
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-1740(200004)54:4<347:TEOSFG>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The effect of selection for growth rate on carcass composition and meat qua lity was assessed by comparing two groups of rabbits belonging to different generations of a selection experiment. A Bayesian approach was used. Embry os belonging to generations 3 and 4 of selection were frozen and thawed to be contemporary of animals from generation 10. A control group (C), formed from offspring of these embryos, was contemporary to offspring of generatio ns 10 and 11 of selection, chosen at random, which constituted the selected group (S). One hundred and thirty-one contemporary rabbits were slaughtere d at approximately the Spanish commercial live weight of 2 kg. Carcasses we re dissected and measured according to the norms of the World Rabbit Scient ific Association. An animal model including effects of genetic group (C, S) and sex, and slaughter weight as a covariate was used. S animals had a hig her development of liver, kidneys and of a set of organs consisting of the thymus, trachea, oesophagus, lung and heart, relative to C. For dissectible fat, S animals had less than C: -0.31 g for scapular fat, -1.62 g for peri renal fat and -2.03 g for inguinal fat. S had a lower content (-0.39%) of d issectible fat percentage in the "Reference" carcass, indicating a lower de gree of maturity at slaughter. The meat to bone ratio was not affected by s election, but the meat and bone contents of the hind leg were 3.25 and 0.71 g higher, respectively, in the C group. Selected animals had a lower water holding capacity in the raw meat (-2.10%), a higher water holding capacity in the cooked meat (2.17%), a higher cooking loss (3.31%) and a lower fat percentage in the meat of a hind leg (-0.37%). Females had more fat than ma les: 0.26 g for scapular fat, 1.02 g for perirenal fat, 1.10 g for inguinal fat, and 0.24% for total dissectible fat percentage of the "Reference" car cass. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.