Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles

Authors
Citation
A. Laurila, Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles, OIKOS, 88(1), 2000, pp. 159-168
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
OIKOS
ISSN journal
00301299 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
159 - 168
Database
ISI
SICI code
0030-1299(200001)88:1<159:BRTPCC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Antipredator behaviour is an important factor influencing survival probabil ity of prey animals, and it may evolve rapidly as a response to changes in predator regime. I studied antipredator behaviour of common frog (Rana temp oraria) tadpoles from thrice populations that differ in predator regimes. I n the first experiment, tadpoles obtained from four natural matings in each population were subjected to chemical cues from either European perch (Per ca fluviatilis) or from larvae of the dragonfly Aeshna juncea. Tadpoles dec reased their activity in response to both predators, but the spatial behavi our of tadpoles differed between the two predator treatments. In general, t here were no differences in behaviours among the populations, but in three out of four studied behaviours there were differences between parentages wi thin the populations suggesting that these behaviours may be genetically de termined. The lack of a significant Predator x Population interaction sugge sts no differences in plastic antipredator behaviour among the populations, while the lack of significant Predator x Parentage interaction suggests no genetic variance within the populations for plastic antipredator behaviour . In the second experiment, tadpoles from the three populations were expose d to predation by a free-ranging A: juncea. In line with the first experime nt, there were no differences in survival rate between the populations. R. temporaria tadpoles seem to rely heavily on plastic antipredator behaviour as their main response to predator chemical cues. There was very little ind ication of local behavioural differentiation and the possible reasons for t he lack of divergence among populations are discussed.