Many vision problems involve the detection of the boundary of an object, li
ke a hand, or the tracking of a one-dimensional structure, such as a road i
n an aerial photograph. These problems can be formulated in terms of Bayesi
an probability theory and hence expressed as optimization problems on trees
or graphs. These optimization problems are difficult because they involve
search through a high-dimensional space corresponding to the possible defor
mations of the object. In this paper, we use the theory of A* heuristic alg
orithms (Pearl, Heuristics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984) to compare t
hree deterministic algorithms - Dijkstra, Dynamic Programming, and Twenty Q
uestions - which have been applied to these problems. We point out that the
first two algorithms can be thought of as special cases of A* with implici
t choices of heuristics. We then analyze the twenty questions, or minimum e
ntropy, algorithm which has recently been developed by Geman and Jedynak (G
eman and Jedynak, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 18 (1) (1996) 1-1
4) as a highly effective. and intuitive, toe search algorithm for road trac
king. First we discuss its relationship to the focus of attention planning
strategy used on causal graphs, or Bayes nets (Pearl, Probalilistic Reasoni
ng in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1988). Then we p
rove that, in many cases, twenty questions is equivalent to an algorithm, w
hich we call A +, which is a variant of A*. Thus all three deterministic al
gorithms are either exact, or approximate, versions of A* with implicit heu
ristics. We then discuss choices of heuristics for optimization problems an
d contrast the relative effectiveness of different heuristics. Finally, we
briefly summarize some recent work (Yuille and Coughlan, Proceedings NIPS'9
8, 1998; Yuille and Coughlan, Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (1999), su
bmitted for publication) which show that the Bayesian formulation can lead
to a natural choice of heuristics which will be very effective with high pr
obability. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.