BACKGROUND. There is debate over whether the recent increases seen in prost
ate cancer are due to lead-time bias from screening, or identification of c
linically insignificant lesions.
METHODS. Population-based incidence rates for 1973-1996 were calculated, ba
sed on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) tumor
registries. Relative incidence rates for prostate cancer by stage, fatal i
ncidence, and lymph nodes were calculated, adjusted for age.
RESULTS. Localized and regional stage prostate cancer increased through 199
2 and then dropped. The rate of distant-stage disease was relatively stable
from 1973-1991, with a decrease in distant stage starting in 1992. The 2-y
ear mortality rates were constant for 1973-1989. A decline in the 2-year mo
rtality among cases (fatal incidence) also began in 1992.
CONCLUSIONS. These data show large increases in early disease, followed by
a drop and leveling off along with a decrease in advanced disease (distant
stage, 2-year mortality, positive lymph nodes). This indicates that the inc
reasing incidence rates for prostate cancer are largely due to lead-time bi
as from increased early detection and treatment of prostate cancer. However
, since incidence rates have not declined to rates seen in the 1970s, the a
dditional cases may also reflect length bias from insignificant lesions or
a true increase in incidence over time. Prostate 42:247-252, 2000. (C) 2000
Wiley-Liss, Inc.