Primary care groups: Trade-offs in managing budgets and risk

Citation
K. Baxter et al., Primary care groups: Trade-offs in managing budgets and risk, PUBL MONEY, 20(1), 2000, pp. 53-62
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
09540962 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
53 - 62
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-0962(200001/03)20:1<53:PCGTIM>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The NHS reforms introduced on 1 April 1999 were intended to remove competit ion and promote co-ope ration. in the delivery of health care. This was to be achieved in part by the develop ment of joint working by groups of Gener al Practitioner (GP) practices covering populations of around 100,000-known as Primary Care Groups (PCGs). A Key element is the integration of respons ibility for managing both the clinical and financial aspects of delivering health care. The authors report on. the success of this new joint role, bas ed on findings from a national survey. There are trade-offs in choosing the scale at which to encourage GPs to take on their new roles. Smaller groups will be better able to integrate practices' clinical and financial respons ibilities, while larger groups will have less financial risk due to random variation.