P. Maingon et al., Radiotherapy of advanced mycosis fungoides: indications and results of total skin electron beam and photon beam irradiation, RADIOTH ONC, 54(1), 2000, pp. 73-78
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Background: The goals of this retrospective study of advanced mycosis fungo
ides are (1) to describe the indications of a combination of total skin ele
ctron beam and photon beam irradiation and (2) to analyze the results of to
tal body or segmental photon irradiation for patients with extension beyond
the skin.
Methods: From January 1975 to December 1995, 45 patients with pathologicall
y-confirmed mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome received a combination of
TSEB and photon beam irradiation for advanced disease: 34 males and 11 fema
les, mean age 61 years (range 27-87 years). The mean follow-up was 111 mont
hs (range 18-244 months, median 85 months). Whole-skin irradiation treatmen
t to a depth of 3-5 mm with a 6-MeV electron beam was produced by a linear
accelerator to a total dose of 24-30 Gy in 8-15 fractions, 3-4 times a week
, In cases of thick plaques or tumors that were beyond the scope of low ene
rgy electron beams of for treating nodal areas (especially in the head and
neck area or axilla involvement), regional irradiation (RRT) with Co-60 pho
ton beams was followed by whole-skin electron beam irradiation (15 patients
). In cases of diffuse erythrodermia, Sezary syndrome, nodal or visceral in
volvement, total body irradiation was delivered with a 25-MV photon beam us
ing a split-course regimen to prevent hematological toxicity (22 patients).
The first course consisted of 1.25 Gy delivered in ten fractions and 10 da
ys. Subsequently, patients received TSEB, Four to 6 weeks after TSEB, they
received a second course of 1.25 Gy. The cumulative TBI dose ranged from 2.
5 to 3 Gy in about 3 months. Hemi-body irradiation (HB) with Co-60 (and a b
olus) was given in cases of multiple regional tumors with large and thick i
nfiltration of the skin to a dose of 9-12 Gy (using fractions of 1-1.5 Gy/d
ay) which, once flattened, were boosted with whole-skin electron beam thera
py (8 patients).
Results: At 3 months, the overall response rate was 75% with 23/45 (51%) pa
tients in complete response and 24% in partial response; one patient had st
able lesions and 1 patient presented progressive disease, The overall respo
nse rate was 81% for T3 patients, 61% for T4, 79% for N1 and 70% for N3. Th
e complete response rate was 67% for T3 and 28% for T4. Sixty-four percent
of N1 patients and 41% of N3 had a complete response. The 5-year actuarial
overall survival was 37% for T3 and 44% for T4 (P = 0.84). Patients with cl
inically abnormal lymph nodes that were pathologically negative (N1) presen
ted a 5-year survival of 63%. Patients with pathologically positive lymph n
odes (N3) experienced a 5-year survival rate of 32% (P = 0.040).
Conclusions: TSEB provides an excellent quality of life by reducing itching
and discharge from the skin. Patients with more advanced disease may be tr
eated and cured by the addition of photon beams in combination with TSEB. A
selection of patients with advanced skin disease and regional extension ma
y be cured by a combination of TSEB and photon beam irradiation. The region
al treatment allows the use of electrons after the reduction of the plaques
or thick tumors and a prophylactic irradiation of the adjacent nodal area.
(C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.