After being in use for three centuries in the Peruvian silver mining, the a
malgamation with mercury method was replaced in the 1890's. This took place
when the main world producers had been using a different method for over h
alf a century. This delay was due to several factors: there was a mercury m
ine in Peru which, though not in use, was always expected to be reactivated
; there was no cash availability for a main technical change; and the legis
lation that had been in force for a long period did not foster large-scale
mining. When some of these conditions changed after 1885, there was a battl
e over technical change fought by the Engineer School of Mines (Escuela de
Ingenieros) on one part, and foreign enterprises, which both defended diffe
rent methods. The latter won the battle when the railways were finished in
early 20th Century. The winning proposal was more efficient in technical te
rms but had less redistributive effects at the regional and national econom
ic level.