Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aidusers

Citation
De. Hayes et Kl. Cormier, Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aidusers, SC AUDIOL, 29(1), 2000, pp. 10-19
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01050397 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
10 - 19
Database
ISI
SICI code
0105-0397(2000)29:1<10:DBCOTH>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
This study was a double blind comparison of three types of hearing aid circ uits: Class A linear peak clipping, Class D compression limiting and K-Amp( TM) wide dynamic range compression. Subjective ratings, speech perception t ests. real ear measurements and questionnaire data were obtained from a gro up of 17 new hearing aid users with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The results indicate a similar performance for all three circuits. We saw no evidence of performance degradation due to saturation distortion, e ven in the presence of high levels of speech and noise. Our primary conclus ions include recommending K-Amps(TM) to new hearing aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss, mostly on the basis of battery life, while cautionin g about the use of compression knee-paint controls and recognizing that Cla ss A and Class D amplifiers are virtually equivalent in every performance m easurement.