Several recent reports have challenged the idea that transposable elements
(TEs) are mainly 'selfish' or 'junk' DNA with little importance for host ev
olution. It has been proposed that TEs have the potential to provide host g
enomes with the ability to enhance their own evolution. They might also be
a major source of genetic diversity, allowing response to environmental cha
nges. Because the relationships between TEs and host genomes are highly var
iable, and because the selfish, junk and beneficial DNA hypotheses are by n
o means mutually exclusive, a single label for these relationships appears
to be inappropriate and potentially misleading.