R. Hoffmann et al., Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures through the modified extensile iliofemoral approach (Maryland), UNFALLCHIRU, 103(1), 2000, pp. 12-21
Forty-nine patients with 50 complex acetabular fractures were treated with
open reduction and internal fixation from August 1993 to February 1996 in a
prospectively documented study. The fractures were fixed with small fragme
nt implants through a modified extensile iliofemoral approach (Maryland app
roach). Thirty-seven patients were polytraumatized with an ISS of 20 pts. o
n average. In 10 patients the ISS was > 25 pts. Good or anatomic initial fr
acture reduction with a fragment stepoff less than or equal to 2 mm could b
e achieved in 48 fracturers (96 %). Thirty-six patients with 37 fractures c
ould be evaluated after 25 months on average. In 28 fractures (76 %) the fu
nctional outcome was good or excellent according to the d'Aubigne and Harri
s scores. Radiological results were excellent in 21 fractures (57%) and sat
isfactory in 12 fractures (Heeg score). In 7 cases (14 %) a postoperative s
ubcutaneous seroma had to be treated surgically. No wound infections, howev
er, were observed. Further complications were secondary a loss of reduction
in 4 cases (11 %), relevant heterotopic ossifications (Brooker III/IV) in
5 cases (14 %), and aseptic femoral head necrosis in 2 cases (5 %). In two
cases a total hip replacement (THR) for posttraumatic arthritis had to be p
erformed. Two more cases are scheduled for THR due to symptomatic femoral h
ead necrosis. A good joint reconstruction can be achieved through the modif
ied extensile iliofemoral approach (Maryland) in complex fractures of the a
cetabulum. However, the approach related morbidity seems to be worrysome. I
n complex fractures with comminution in the roof of the acetabulum the prog
nosis remains uncertain even in cases where initial anatomic joint reconstr
uction can be achieved.