Kt. Mullen et al., Contour integration in color vision: a common process for the blue-yellow,red-green and luminance mechanisms?, VISION RES, 40(6), 2000, pp. 639-655
We compare the performance of the red-green, blue-yellow and luminance post
receptoral mechanisms on a contour integration task requiring the linking o
f oriented Gabor elements across space to extract a winding 'path' or conto
ur. We first establish that for all three mechanisms curvature and contrast
are independent; losses in performance due to one cannot be compensated by
changes in the other. We then compare contour integration by the three mec
hanisms using a method that controls for their differences in cone contrast
thresholds. Our results show that despite the poor orientation discriminat
ion thresholds and poor spatial sampling found for the blue-yellow mechanis
m, all three mechanisms perform similarly on contour integration over a wid
e range of curvatures. Furthermore, all three mechanisms have the same depe
ndence on path curvature. We also investigate the effects of adding externa
l orientation noise. Our results imply that the internal orientation noise
for extracting 'aligned' path elements is similar in the three mechanisms a
nd for all path curvatures, and the relative efficiencies are also similar
for the three mechanisms. To account for our results, we propose that the t
hree postreceptoral mechanisms use a common contour integration process. Th
is linking process, however, cannot be color-blind; our last experiment sho
ws that linking between different chromatic mechanisms or between opposite
spatial phases disrupts contour integration. We thus propose that the commo
n integration process remains sensitive to the color contrast and phase of
its inputs. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.