Dr. Mount et Jr. Hockett, Use of toxicity identification evaluation methods to characterize, identify, and confirm hexavalent chromium toxicity in an industrial effluent, WATER RES, 34(4), 2000, pp. 1379-1385
A toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) was conducted on effluent from a
major industrial discharger. Although initial monitoring typically showed
only slight, intermittent, chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. a later
sample showed substantial acute toxicity to C. dubia (48-h lc(50) = 9%). Ac
ute phase I toxicity characterization tests were conducted on this acutely
toxic sample; none of the phase I manipulations reduced sample toxicity. Th
e toxic effluent sample was then treated with activated carbon, and cation,
anion, and mixed-bed ion exchange. Acute toxicity was not reduced by treat
ment with activated carbon or cation exchange, but was completely removed b
y anion and mixed-bed ion exchange. Based on these data, we concluded that
the causative toxicant(s) was likely an inorganic anion(s); chemical analys
is detected hexavalent chromium Cr[VI] at concentrations sufficient to acco
unt for the observed acute toxicity. Although Cr[VI] could clearly explain
the presence of acute toxicity, subsequent confirmation testing was designe
d to determine whether Cr[IV] was responsible for the low-level chronic tox
icity more typical of the effluent. Concurrent chronic tests conducted on u
naltered and anion-exchanged effluent showed that the presence of chronic t
oxicity was associated with chronically toxic concentrations of Cr[VI]. The
source of Cr[VI] in the effluent was traced to a malfunctioning heat excha
nger. after this malfunction was corrected, neither chronic toxicity nor ap
preciable Cr[VI] was observed in the effluent again. Published by Elsevier
Science Ltd.