Revascularization of the cavernous bodies (CB) has its place in a highly se
lected patient population as the only causal therapy for erectile dysfuncti
on (ED) and provides an alternative to the implantation of alloplastic erec
tile aids.
The indication for arterialization of the CB is currently only established
when conservative treatment has failed. The most important criteria for the
intervention are controversial: an age of under 50, an incidence of not mo
re than two classical risk factors for impotence and the exclusion of diabe
tes mellitus.
The leading revascularization procedure in German-speaking countries compri
ses arteriovenous shunting of the inferior epigastric artery with the dorsa
l vein and artery of the penis.
A retrospective analysis of results is problematic due to the nonuniform in
dicational criteria, the multiplicity of applied revascularization procedur
es and a nonstandardized follow-up. Subjective assessment of improved erect
ility is the sole target criterion in the majority of studies. Therapeutic
results range from 33 to 87 % with regard to subjective success rates. Atte
mpts to objectify the treatment results were made in only few of the studie
s and disclosed bypass patency in 44 to 92 % one year after the interventio
n.
The conclusions drawn at the last "Consensus Development Conference on Impo
tence'' (CDCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NTH) in Washington hav
e not lost their topicality in view of the great number of still unanswered
questions. Then the recommendation was made in 1992 to perform penile arte
rialization only in controlled prospective clinical trials. The European Ur
ological Association (EUA) is currently organizing a Consensus Conference t
hat will provide the framework for prospective studies that can serve as a
basis for clarifying the open questions.