Sm. Miller et al., Monitoring styles in women at risk for cervical cancer: Implications for the framing of health-relevant messages, ANN BEHAV M, 21(1), 1999, pp. 27-34
We explored the intel action effects of individual attentional style (high
versus low monitoring) and the framing of informational messages on the res
ponses of women undergoing diagnostic follow-lip (colposcopy)for precancero
ns cervical lesions. Prior to the colposcopic procedure, patients (N=76) we
re randomly assigned to one of three preparatory conditions: (a) Loss-frame
d message, which emphasized the cost of nonadherence to screening recommend
ations; (b) cain-framed message, which emphasized the benefit of adherence;
and (c) Neurrally-framed message. It was hypothesized that low monitors (w
ho are more positively biased about their health) would show a move adaptiv
e pattern of response to loss-framed information than high monitors (who ar
e more negatively biased about their health). The results of a series of hi
erarchical multiple regression analyses were consistent with this predictio
n. Low monitoring was associated with greater knowledge retention (beta = .
61, p < .05) and less canceling/ rescheduling of follow-up appointments in
the loss condition than in the neutral condition (beta = .82, p < .002). Hi
gh monitoring, however was associated with greater intrusive ideation when
information was presented in the loss-oriented frame as compared to the neu
tral frame (beta = .99, p < .01). Knowledge retention and screening adheren
ce were not affected by the framing manipulation The differences between hi
gh versus low monitors as a function of loss or neutral frame suggest an in
teraction effect, wherein both the type of framing message and the individu
al's attentional style lend to distinctive cognitive-affective and behavior
al patterns. The findings may have clinical implications for the tailoring
of health messages to the individual's signature style.