Monitoring styles in women at risk for cervical cancer: Implications for the framing of health-relevant messages

Citation
Sm. Miller et al., Monitoring styles in women at risk for cervical cancer: Implications for the framing of health-relevant messages, ANN BEHAV M, 21(1), 1999, pp. 27-34
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
08836612 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
27 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0883-6612(199924)21:1<27:MSIWAR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
We explored the intel action effects of individual attentional style (high versus low monitoring) and the framing of informational messages on the res ponses of women undergoing diagnostic follow-lip (colposcopy)for precancero ns cervical lesions. Prior to the colposcopic procedure, patients (N=76) we re randomly assigned to one of three preparatory conditions: (a) Loss-frame d message, which emphasized the cost of nonadherence to screening recommend ations; (b) cain-framed message, which emphasized the benefit of adherence; and (c) Neurrally-framed message. It was hypothesized that low monitors (w ho are more positively biased about their health) would show a move adaptiv e pattern of response to loss-framed information than high monitors (who ar e more negatively biased about their health). The results of a series of hi erarchical multiple regression analyses were consistent with this predictio n. Low monitoring was associated with greater knowledge retention (beta = . 61, p < .05) and less canceling/ rescheduling of follow-up appointments in the loss condition than in the neutral condition (beta = .82, p < .002). Hi gh monitoring, however was associated with greater intrusive ideation when information was presented in the loss-oriented frame as compared to the neu tral frame (beta = .99, p < .01). Knowledge retention and screening adheren ce were not affected by the framing manipulation The differences between hi gh versus low monitors as a function of loss or neutral frame suggest an in teraction effect, wherein both the type of framing message and the individu al's attentional style lend to distinctive cognitive-affective and behavior al patterns. The findings may have clinical implications for the tailoring of health messages to the individual's signature style.