Jm. Weiler et al., Effects of fexofenadine, diphenhydramine, and alcohol on driving performance - A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the Iowa Driving Simulator, ANN INT MED, 132(5), 2000, pp. 354
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Sedating antihistamines may impair driving performance as serio
usly as alcohol.
Objective: To compare the effects of fexofenadine, diphenhydramine, alcohol
, and placebo on driving performance.
Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-treatment, four-period
crossover trial.
Setting: The lowa Driving Simulator.
Participants: 40 licensed drivers with seasonal allergic rhinitis who were
25 to 44 years of age.
Intervention: One dose of fexofenadine (60 mg), diphenhydramine (50 mg), al
cohol (approximately 0.1 % blood alcohol concentration), or placebo, given
at weekly intervals before participants drove for 1 hour in the lowa Drivin
g Simulator.
Measurements: The primary end point was coherence, a continuous measure of
participants' ability to match the varying speed of a vehicle that they wer
e following. Secondary end points were drowsiness and other driving measure
s, including lane keeping and response to a vehicle that unexpectedly block
ed the lane ahead.
Results: Participants had significantly better coherence after taking alcoh
ol or fexofenadine than after taking diphenhydramine. Lane keeping (steerin
g instability and crossing the center line) was impaired after alcohol and
diphenhydramine use compared with fexofenadine use. Mean response time to t
he blocking vehicle was slowest after alcohol use (2.21 seconds) compared w
ith fexofenadine use (1.95 seconds). Self-reported drowsiness did not predi
ct lack of coherence and was weakly associated with minimum following dista
nce, steering instability, and left-lane excursion.
Conclusions: Participants had similar performance when treated with fexofen
adine or placebo. After alcohol use, participants performed the primary tas
k well but not the secondary tasks; as a result, overall driving performanc
e was poorer. After participants took diphenhydramine, driving performance
was poorest, indicating that diphenhydramine had a greater impact on drivin
g than alcohol did. Drowsiness ratings were not a good predictor of impairm
ent, suggesting that drivers cannot use drowsiness to indicate when they sh
ould not drive.