The preferred method for assessing the attenuation of hearing-protective de
vices (HPDs) involves real ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) determinatio
ns, usually obtained in accordance with ANSI Standard S12.6-1997 or ISO Sta
ndard 4869-1, where measurements are normally made in the range 125-8000 Hz
. In certain circumstances, the use of an acoustic test fixture (ATF) with
built-in artificial ears is an acceptable substitute for subjective testing
. In this case, the metric obtained is "insertion loss"; the difference bet
ween the open-ear and occluded-ear sound levels measured using the ATF micr
ophone. REAT attenuations are not generally interchangeable with insertion
loss measurements; however, their similarity often promotes data comparison
. Experience has shown that subjective thresholds obtained above 8000 Hz ar
e highly variable due primarily to decreased hearing sensitivity and to the
complexity of high-frequency wave patterns. With an ATF, measurements may
be carried out over an extended frequency range while minimizing the proble
ms associated with subjective evaluations. In this study, the high-frequenc
y insertion loss of two earmuff and three earplug HPDs was measured objecti
vely at frequencies up to 22.4 kHz. One of the earplugs provided consistent
ly better performance than the other devices for both grazing and direct so
und incidence. In addition, two lightweight materials (copier paper and foa
mcore sheeting) were evaluated for high-frequency noise reduction when plac
ed in the direct path between the sound source and the artificial ear of th
e ATF. Of these, the foamcore was the more effective barrier. Crown copyrig
ht (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.