Energy-consumption guides (ECGs), produced by the UK Government agencies ET
SU and BRECSU under the DETR's Energy-Efficiency Best-Practice Programme, h
ave been examined. The aim was to assess and, if possible, improve the meth
odologies used for the production of ECGs, and in particular to ensure (i)
the conclusions are statistically valid; (ii) each presentation appeals to
its appropriate target audience; and, in each instance, (iii) ease of infor
mation extraction is facilitated. In the course of the study, several ECGs
were considered, together with their consultants' reports and the answers t
o pertinent survey questionnaires. The problems with these ECGs fell into t
hree categories - the use of inappropriate indicators and/or sample populat
ions for energy benchmarking; errors in calculations presented in the guide
s; and mistakes, ambiguities and other weaknesses in the published text. Th
ese problems, although detected in relatively few ECGs, were due to inadequ
ate quality-control and/or a lack of appropriate technical review of the do
cuments before publication. The aim throughout this investigation was to de
velop a more coherent strategy in order for authors and editors, of future
Guides, to present only the facts relevant to the needs of each intended ca
tegory of user in a persuasive, clear and simple manner. (C) 2000 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.