The global attention has always been focussed on the adverse environmental
impacts of conventional energy sources. In contrast nonconventional energy
sources, particularly the renewable ones, have enjoyed a 'clean' image vis
a vis environmental impacts. The only major exception to this general trend
has been large hydropower projects; experience has taught us that they can
be disastrous for the environment. The belief now is that minihydel and mi
crohydel projects are harmless alternatives. But are renewable energy sourc
es really as benign as is widely believed? The present essay addresses this
question in the background of Lovin's classical paradigm, which had postul
ated the hard (malignant) and soft (benign) energy concepts in the first pl
ace. It critically evaluates the environmental impacts of major renewable e
nergy sources. It then comes up with the broad conclusion that renewable en
ergy sources are not the panacea they are popularly perceived to be; indeed
in some cases their adverse environmental impacts can be as strongly negat
ive as the impacts of conventional energy sources. The paper also dwells on
the steps we need to take so that we can utilize renewable energy sources
without facing environmental backlashes of the type we got from hydropower
projects. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.