Use of self-report to monitor overweight and obesity in populations: some issues for consideration

Citation
V. Flood et al., Use of self-report to monitor overweight and obesity in populations: some issues for consideration, AUS NZ J PU, 24(1), 2000, pp. 96-99
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ISSN journal
13260200 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
96 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
1326-0200(200002)24:1<96:UOSTMO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective:To examine the validity of self-reported height and weight data r eported over the telephone In the 1997 NSW Health Survey, and to determine its accuracy to monitor overweight and obesity in population surveys. Method: Self-reported and measured heights and weights were collected from 227 people living in Western Sydney, who had participated in the NSW Health Survey 1997. Results: Self-reported (SR) weights and heights led to misclassification of relative weight status, BMI, based on measured weights and heights, classi fied 62% of males and 47% of females as overweight or obese, compared with 39% and 32%, respectively, from self-report. Conclusions Caution should be used when interpreting SR height and weight d ata from surveys, because BMI derived from these is likely to underestimate the true prevalence of overweight and obesity. Implications: SR data have a place in nutrition monitoring because they are relatively inexpensive and easy to collect. However, classifying people in to weight categories on the basis of accepted cutpoints, using SR heights a nd weights yields inaccurate prevalence estimates. Periodic sub-studies of the validity of SR heights and weights are needed to indicate the extent to which the validity of SR is changing.