Student opinion surveys (SOSs) are commonly used in universities to measure
student perceptions of teaching performance. Ostensibly their prime purpos
e is to improve teaching quality. This paper critically examines SOSs in ei
ght Australian universities where survey design and analysis were examined
and compared with literature recommendations. We find that current SOSs are
neither designed nor structured according to sound questionnaire technique
and that, as part of a teaching evaluation system, they are seriously flaw
ed. Deficiencies include: their use as the sole measure of teaching effecti
veness, the tendency for universities to rely on unmoderated student opinio
n without tempering the results with contextual factors, and a lack of test
ing for reliability and validity that renders the data of unknown precision
. We argue that, at present, SOSs expose teachers to unreliable, invalid op
inions that influence teacher career advancement and job security.