Brooker's classification of the eucalypts, which combines Angophora, Corymb
ia and Eucalyptus into one genus, is contrary to phylogenetic evidence base
d on eight different data sets including morphology, RFLPs, and sequence da
ta for various regions of nuclear and chloroplast DNA (5S rDNA spacer regio
n, ITS1, ITS2, trnL intron, trnL-F spacer and psbA-trnH spacer). On this ev
idence and the principle of recognising monophyletic taxa, we reject his sy
nonymy of these genera.