Objective. To compare the in vitro stability of two cemented hip stem desig
ns: Stem I was a collarless, double-tapered, highly polished implant; Stem
II had a collar and matt finish.
Background. Stability of the femoral component of a hip implant is importan
t for its long-term clinical success. Excessive migration or cyclic motion
can increase the risk of early implant failure.
Methods. The stems were implanted in paired human cadaver femurs, and custo
m-designed micromotion sensors were used to measure three-dimensional motio
ns of the stems at proximal middle and distal locations during simulated in
vivo loading cycles.
Results. This study found that despite 'rigid' fixation, cemented stems exh
ibit detectable motions under a limited number of cycles of simulated physi
ologic loads. At four times the donor body might, Stem I showed a subsidenc
e of 90 mu m, compared to 25 um of Stem II (P < 0.05). In contrast, the pro
ximal end of Stem II exhibited greater cyclic motions in the medial-lateral
direction (P < 0.05).
Conclusions. The different motion patterns could be due to the design diffe
rences, such as surface finish and geometry.