Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients
A. Bur et al., Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients, CRIT CARE M, 28(2), 2000, pp. 371-376
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measure
ment according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumferenc
e in critically ill patients.
Design: Prospective data collection.
Setting: Emergency department in a 2,000-bed inner city hospital,
Patients: Thirty-eight patients categorized into three groups according to
their upper-arm circumference (group 1: 18-25 cm; group 11: 25.1-33 cm; and
group ill: 33.1-47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol,
Interventions: In each patient, all three cuff sizes (Hewlett-Packard Cuff
40401 B, C, and D) were used to perform an oscillometric blood pressure mea
surement at least within 3 mins until ten to 20 measurements for each cuff
size were achieved. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was d
one by cannulation of the contralateral radial artery with direct transduct
ion of the systemic arterial pressure waveform, The corresponding invasive
blood pressure value was obtained at the end of each oscillometric measurem
ent.
Measurement and Main Results: Overall, 1,494 pairs of simultaneous oscillom
etric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 38 patient
s (group I, n = 5; group II, n = 23; and group III, n = 10) over a total ti
me of 72.3 hrs, Mean arterial blood pressure ranged from 35 to 165 mm Hg, T
he overall discrepancy between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure me
asurement was -6.7 +/- 9.7 mm Hg (p < ,0001), if the recommended cuff size
according to the upper-arm circumference was used (539 measurements), Of al
l the blood pressure measurements, 26.4% (n = 395) had a discrepancy of gre
ater than or equal to 10 mm Hg and 34.2% (n = 512) exhibited a discrepancy
of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. No differences between invasive and n
oninvasive blood pressure measurements were noted in patients either with o
r without inotropic support (-6,6 + 7.2 vs, -8.6 + 6.8 mm Hg; not significa
nt).
Conclusion: The oscillometric blood pressure measurement significantly unde
restimates arterial blood pressure and exhibits a high number of measuremen
ts out of the clinically acceptable range, The relation between cuff size a
nd upper-arm circumference contributes substantially to the inaccuracy of t
he oscillometric blood pressure measurement, Therefore, oscillometric blood
pressure measurement does not achieve adequate accuracy in critically ill
patients.