Xenia effects in maize with normal endosperm: II. Kernel growth and enzymeactivities during grain filling

Citation
C. Bulant et al., Xenia effects in maize with normal endosperm: II. Kernel growth and enzymeactivities during grain filling, CROP SCI, 40(1), 2000, pp. 182-189
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
CROP SCIENCE
ISSN journal
0011183X → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
182 - 189
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-183X(200001/02)40:1<182:XEIMWN>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Xenia can be defined as the effect of the pollen genes on the development o f the fruit or the seeds. In maize (Zea mays L) with normal endosperm, the relative advantage in weight of cross-fertilized to self-fertilized kernels can reach 13% when inbred lines are used as females. To improve our unders tanding of the physiological bases of such a phenomenon in this species, we studied the accumulation of carbohydrate and the activities of starch-synt hesizing enzymes during the grain filling period in kernels from self and c ross fertilization on independent ears from the same female inbred line, Wi th one inbred line as female, selfed and crossed to an unrelated male, kern el growth was studied at 14, 21, 28, 39, and 74 d after pollination (DAP). The cross-fertilization effect on kernel dry weight was maximum at 14 DAP a nd then decreased about 10%, Male effects on enzyme activities and carbohyd rate content were studied at 14 and 28 DAP in a 3-by-3 diallel from inbred lines, At 14 DAP, the advantage of cross-fertilization on average was 28.8% for starch content, 24.8% for ADP-glucose-pyrophosphorylase (EC 2.7.7.27) activity, and 24.1% for neutral invertase (EC 3.2.1.26) activity. The advan tage depended on the cross for sucrose content, acid invertase activity, an d sucrose synthase (EC 2.4.1.13) activity. At 28 DAP, cross-fertilization a dvantage was not significant for enzyme activities or carbohydrate content but was still significant for kernel dry weight (+7.8%), At both stages, th ere was no correspondence between male and Female effects, when both were s ignificant. The data tend to show that differences in male effects for enzy me activities are expressed early after fertilization but are insufficient to explain male effects at the level of kernel weight.