Reports of key information systems issues have been published over the last
two decades in many journals. Leading IS journals (e.g., MIS Quarterly, In
formation & Management, among others) have published key IS management issu
e reports every three or four years over the last 15 years, and will probab
ly continue to provide such reports in the future. Although these reports c
laim to provide decisional guidance to practitioners, researchers, consulta
nts, etc., the authors in their experience have noted concerns about their
usefulness. While not questioning the validity of the methods and analysis
conducted in these studies, we address two important questions in this arti
cle: the manner of reporting of the key issue results (which might be misle
ading), and the relevance of the results tare they providing what they inte
nded to?). We hope that our discussion will provide new perspectives in mak
ing resource allocation decisions to both readers and authors of key issue
articles.