We discuss worst-case bounds on the ratio of maximum matching and minimum m
edian values for finite point sets. In particular, we consider "minimum sta
rs," which are defined by a center chosen from the given point set, such th
at the total geometric distance L-S to all the points in the set is minimiz
ed. If the center point is not required to be an element of the set (i.e.,
the center may be a Steiner point), we get a "minimum Steiner star" of tota
l length L-SS. As a consequence of triangle inequality, the total length L-
M of a maximum matching is a lower bound for the length L-SS of a minimum S
teiner star, which makes the worst-case value rho(SS, M) of the value L-SS/
L-M interesting in the context of optimal communication networks, The ratio
also appears as the duality gap in an integer programming formulation of a
location problem by Tamir and Mitchell.
In this paper we show that for a finite set that consists of an even number
of points in the plane and Euclidean distances, the worst-case ratio rho(S
, M) cannot exceed 2/root 3. This proves a conjecture of Suri, who gave an
example where this bound is achieved. For the case of Euclidean distances i
n two and three dimensions, we also prove upper and lower bounds for the wo
rst-case value rho(S, SS) of the ratio L-S/L-SS, and for the worst-case val
ue rho(S, M) of the ratio L-S/L-M. We give tight upper bounds for the case
where distances are measured according to the Manhattan metric: we show tha
t in three-dimensional space, rho(SS, M) is bounded by 3/2, while in two-di
mensional space L-SS = L-M, extending some independent observations by Tami
r and Mitchell. Finally, we show that rho(S, SS) is 3/2 in the two-dimensio
nal case, and 5/3 in the three-dimensional case.