In this article, I argue that the dichotomy between events and affordances
as Stoffregen (target article, this issue) devises is unwarranted and poten
tially misleading. I challenge the notion that the role of the actor distin
guishes events from affordances in any useful way. The research labeled eve
nt perception is neither less ecological nor qualitatively different from r
esearch on affordances. Instead, the main distinction is constituted by aff
ordance being a perceptual property, whereas event pertains to a different
semantic category. Nonetheless, the contemplation of these concepts, in par
ticular an elaboration of the concept of affordance, is desperately needed.