Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a North Italian population

Citation
A. Lodi et al., Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a North Italian population, EUR J DERM, 10(2), 2000, pp. 128-132
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
11671122 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
128 - 132
Database
ISI
SICI code
1167-1122(200003)10:2<128:EOOCDI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) is a very important skin disease both for its high frequency and for its social and economic implications. The aim of our work is to evaluate the epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a north-Italian population and the possibility of a correct etiological diagnosis using the patch test standard series of GIRDCA (Itali an Group of Resarch on Contact Dermatitis). We patch tested 1,565 out-patients affected by dermatitis with standard ser ies GIRDCA and with other specific professional haptens. The manifestations were suspected of being of occupational origin by a derm atologist on the basis of clinical and anamnestic data. Of all the recorded professions we have considered only the moro numerically significant: food industry, building industry, textile industry, employees, cleaners, hospit al personnel, hairdressers, housewives, mechanics and metallurgists. Sixty-nine percent of contact dermatitis was found in women, the hairdresse rs had the greatest number of patients in the younger group (68.7% in the 1 1-20 years age group) and the textile industry workers in older group (100% in the 41-50 years age group). A positive allergological anamnesis emerged in 32.3% of allergic contact dermatitis. Irritant contact dermatitis (10.6 %) was more frequent than allergic contact dermatitis (8.4%). The hands are the most common localization (94.4%). The allergen with the highest freque ncy of positive reactions is p-phenylenediamine (25.3%). We discuss the fre quency of positives to various groups of allergens in each profession and t he principal means of contact. Because of the frequency of this type of occ upational skin disease, we stress the importance of prevention. The standard series GIRDCA was found to be adequate for recognizing occupat ional contact dermatitis in most of our patients (74%).