Objectives-Hairdressers are exposed to many irritative and allergenic
substances capable of causing occupational respiratory symptoms and di
seases. The self reported prevalence of respiratory symptoms and disea
ses was studied, and the risks among hairdressers compared with salesw
omen was estimated. Methods-A cross sectional prevalence study of resp
iratory symptoms and diseases was carried out among hairdressers and s
upermarket saleswomen, with a computer assisted telephone interview me
thod (CATI). The study population comprised all the female hairdresser
s and supermarket saleswomen aged 15-54 years in the Helsinki metropol
itan area, Finland. Disproportionate random samples of female hairdres
sers and saleswomen were drawn from the trade union membership registe
rs. The interviews were carried out between February and April 1994. A
response rate of 80.5% (355/440) was obtained for hairdressers and 82
.2% (583/709) for saleswomen. Atopy, smoking, chronic illnesses, type
of work, working hours, working conditions, personal and professional
use of hair products, and the use of personal protective devices were
assessed. The outcome variables were self reported symptoms of the upp
er and lower respiratory tract. These were used to define chronic bron
chitis, and asthma, laryngitis, and allergic rhinitis diagnosed by a p
hysician. Results-There was a considerable difference in the prevalenc
e of chronic bronchitis; 6.8% in hairdressers versus 1.9% in saleswome
n. The odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, smoking, and atopy for chroni
c bronchitis indicated an increased risk of chronic bronchitis (OR 4.8
, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.2 to 10.1). No association was fo
und between work as a hairdresser and asthma, laryngitis, and allergic
rhinitis. Also the prevalence of rhinitis, rhinitis with eye symptoms
, cough with phlegm, dyspnoea, and dyspnoea accompanied by cough was i
ncreased among hairdressers. The corresponding adjusted risk ORs were
1.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.3) for rhinitis, 1.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) for rhin
itis with eye symptoms, 1.4 (CI 1.1 to 1.9) for cough with phlegm, 1.5
(95% CI 1.0 to 2.2) for dyspnoea, and 1.6 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.7) for dys
pnoea with cough. Conclusions-Our results indicate an increased preval
ence of upper and lower respiratory symptoms among hairdressers. Aller
genic and irritative chemicals in hairdressing are likely candidates e
xplaining the difference found between the hairdressers and controls.
Work related reasons should be considered when a hairdresser presents
with airway symptoms. Preventive actions are needed to improve the wor
king conditions and personal protection.