Ma. Arain et al., Implementing surface parameter aggregation rules in the CCM3 global climate model: regional responses at the land surface, HYDROL E S, 3(4), 1999, pp. 463-476
The land-surface parameters required as input to a GCM grid box (typically
a few degrees) are often set to be those of the dominant vegetation type wi
thin the grid box. This paper discusses the use and effect of aggregation r
ules for specifying effective values of these land cover parameters by taki
ng into account the relative proportion of each land-cover type within each
individual grid box. Global land-cover classification data at 1 km resolut
ion were used to define Biosphere Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) specifi
c aggregate (using aggregation rules) land-cover parameters. Comparison of
the values of the aggregate parameters and those defined using the single d
ominant vegetation type (default parameters) shows significant differences
in some regions, particularly in the semi-desert and in forested regions, e
.g, the Sahara Desert and the tropical forest of South America. These two d
ifferent sets of parameters were used as input data for two 10-year simulat
ions of the NCAR CCM3 model coupled to the BATS land-surface scheme. Statis
tical analyses comparing the results of the two model runs showed that the
resulting effects on the land-surface diagnostics are significant only in s
pecific regions. For example, the sensible heat flux in the Sahara Desert c
alculated for the aggregate parameter run increased due to the marked incre
ase in the minimum stomatal resistance and the decrease in fractional veget
ation cover in the aggregate parameters over the default parameters. The mo
delled global precipitation and surface air temperature fields were compare
d to observations: there is a general improvement in the performance of the
aggregate parameter run over the default parameter run in areas where the
differences between the aggregate and default parameter run are significant
. However, most of the difference between the modelled and observed fields
is attributable to other model deficiencies. It can be concluded that the u
se of aggregation rules to derive land-surface parameters results in signif
icant changes in modelled climate and in some improvements in the land-surf
ace diagnostics in selected regions. There is also some evidence that there
is a response in the global circulation pattern, which is a focus of furth
er work.