Whm. Vankuijk et al., CRITICAL ROLE OF THE EXTRACORPOREAL BLOOD TEMPERATURE IN THE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE DURING HEMOFILTRATION, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 8(6), 1997, pp. 949-955
Impaired vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialy
sis (UF + HD) compared with hemofiltration (HF) remains a rather enigm
atic problem, the causes of which are still not well understood. Altho
ugh a number of factors have been claimed to be responsible, most rece
nt studies point to a major role of the extracorporeal blood temperatu
re, which is usually lower during HF compared with UF + HD. However, p
revious studies in which hemodynamics were studied during UF + HD and
HF in relation to the extracorporeal blood temperature are limited by
the use of acetate in UF + HD, and measurements were often confined to
BP and heart rate, Therefore, arterial BP, as well as forearm vascula
r resistance (FVR) and venous tone (strain-gauge plethysmography), was
measured in 11 hemodialysis patients during 3 h UF + HD (37.5 degrees
C) and predilution HF (39.0 degrees C = warm HF), resulting in equiva
lent extracorporeal blood temperatures. Patients were also studied dur
ing cold HF at an infusate temperature of 36.0 degrees C. UF + HD and
HF were matched with respect to the dialysate and infusate composition
(bicarbonate), biocompatibility factors, and small molecule clearance
. At equivalent temperatures, UF + HD and HF were associated with a co
mparable vascular and BP response. Only cold HF was associated with a
significant increase in FVR. In addition, FVR and venous tone, as well
as arterial BP, were all significantly higher during cold HF compared
with both UF + HD and warm HF. These results indicate that the dispar
ity in vascular reactivity between UF + HD and HF is primarily related
to differences in the extracorporeal blood temperature.