Development of a monoclonal antibody-based cELISA for the analysis of sulfadimethoxine. 2. Evaluation of rapid extraction methods and implications for the analysis of incurred residues in chicken liver tissue
Mt. Muldoon et al., Development of a monoclonal antibody-based cELISA for the analysis of sulfadimethoxine. 2. Evaluation of rapid extraction methods and implications for the analysis of incurred residues in chicken liver tissue, J AGR FOOD, 48(2), 2000, pp. 545-550
Several rapid extraction methods were evaluated for use with a monoclonal a
ntibody-based competitive inhibition ELISA (cELISA) to detect sulfadimethox
ine (SDM) in chicken liver tissue. These methods included extraction of the
samples with (1) aqueous buffer with or without ultrafiltration, (2) aceto
nitrile/water, (3) methanol/water, or (4) acetone. The organic extraction m
ethods were evaluated with or without solvent evaporation prior to dilution
into assay buffer for the cELISA. The aqueous-based extraction methods wer
e compatible with the cELISA. However, of the organic extraction methods, o
nly the acetone liver extract with solvent evaporation prior to analysis wa
s compatible with the cELISA. The cELISA method coupled to aqueous- or acet
one-based sample extraction as well as an HPLC method was evaluated for the
analysis of chicken liver tissues fortified with SDM at levels from 0.2 to
0.025 ppm. Mean SDM recoveries for the HPLC method and for the cELISA meth
od using samples prepared by aqueous extraction, aqueous extraction and ult
rafiltration, or acetone extraction, evaporation, and reconstitution were 6
8.9, 95.7, 60.1, and 52.5%, respectively. For the analysis of samples obtai
ned from an SDM incurred residue study, HPLC and cELISA analysis of the sam
e organic extract gave results that were highly correlated (R-2 = 0.976; p
< 0.0001). However, results obtained from the analysis of aqueous extracts
by cELISA did not correlate well with those obtained by HPLC (R-2 = 0.61,p
> 0.0006). This was attributed to the coextraction:of cross-reactive SDM-re
lated residues that were not quantified by the HPLC method. The presence of
these residues should be considered during data interpretation when ELISA
methods coupled with rapid aqueous extraction of samples are used in SDM re
sidue monitoring programs.