Effects of sire growth potential, growing-finishing strategy, and time on feed on performance, composition, and efficiency of steers

Citation
Re. Short et al., Effects of sire growth potential, growing-finishing strategy, and time on feed on performance, composition, and efficiency of steers, J ANIM SCI, 77(9), 1999, pp. 2406-2417
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2406 - 2417
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(199909)77:9<2406:EOSGPG>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Beef production systems that increase use of unharvested forages and use an imals with greater potential for gain affect age and size of animals placed on a finishing regimen. This experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of genetic potential for gain, age at the start of a finishing period, and time on feed on composition, quantity, and quality of beef produced and eff iciency of production during finishing. Crossbred cows were bred by AI to C harolais or Line 1 Hereford bulls that represented potentially high (HG) or moderate growth (MG) rates, respectively, to produce spring- or fall-born calves. Steer calves from these matings were placed on an individually fed finishing diet at three ages (A). Spring-born steers were started at 6 or 1 8 mo of age (A6 and A18), and fall-born steers were started at 12 mo of age (A12). Slaughter times (T) were at 0, 90, 180, and 270 d for A6; 68, 136, and 204 d for A12; and 0, 45, 90, and 135 d for A18. Data collected on each animal included feed intake, growth, chemical composition of the complete body and carcass, and quantitative and qualitative assessment of the meat p roduced. Four steers of each sire group were slaughtered in each of the 11 A-T treatment groups, and the experiment was repeated for 2 yr in the A12 g roups and 3 yr in the A6 and A18 groups (n = 237). Steers sired by HG bulls were larger and produced larger carcasses and more carcass protein than MG -sired steers (S, P < .05 or .01). Steers sired by MG bulls were fatter, ha d higher quality grades, and accumulated fat at a faster rate than HG-sired steers, and this effect was greater in older steers (G and GA, P < .05 or .01). Sire growth potential did not affect gain, intake, live weight effici ency, tenderness, or taste panel scores (P > .2). Steers sired by HG bulls were more efficient at producing carcass weight and carcass protein at A12 and A18 than were MG-sired steers. At the end of the finishing period, olde r (A18), HG-sired steers were too large with insufficient fat by cm:rent in dustry standards, and younger (A6), MG-sired steers were too small. Our con clusions are that both HG- and MG-sired steers call produce acceptable carc asses for current market standards with comparable efficiencies of live-wei ght gain, but the growing and finishing strategy must be adapted to the gen otype.