Why did The College Board summarily squelch an experimental SAT scoring sys
tem that could have been helpful to hard-pressed college admissions officer
s in their efforts to build academically strong and diverse classrooms?
As was the case a decade ago when a similar experimental effort was discont
inued by the Educational Testing Service, it appears that encouraging the e
mergence of a fairer or more useful alternative to the standard SAT scoring
system was profoundly threatening to the $250 million annual income which
supports both The College Board and the Educational Testing Service.