Strategy flexibility in mathematical problem solving was investigated. In S
tudies 1 and 2, high school juniors and seniors solved Scholastic Assessmen
t Test-Mathematics (SAT-M) problems classified as conventional or unconvent
ional. Algorithmic solution strategies were students' default choice for bo
th types of problems across conditions that manipulated item format and sol
ution time. Use of intuitive strategies on unconventional problems was evid
ent only for high-ability students. Male students were more likely than Fem
ale students to successfully match strategies to problem characteristics. I
n Study 3, a revised taxonomy of problems based on cognitive solution deman
ds was predictive of gender differences on Graduate Record Examination-Quan
titative (GRE-Q) items. Men outperformed women overall, but the difference
was greater on items requiring spatial skills. shortcuts, or multiple solut
ion paths than on problems requiring verbal skills or mastery of classroom-
based content. Results suggest that strategy flexibility is a source of gen
der differences in mathematical ability assessed by SAT-M and GRE-Q problem
solving. (C) 2000 Acedemic Press.