Reduction of solar UV by clouds: A comparison between satellite-derived cloud effects and ground-based radiation measurements

Citation
J. Matthijsen et al., Reduction of solar UV by clouds: A comparison between satellite-derived cloud effects and ground-based radiation measurements, J GEO RES-A, 105(D4), 2000, pp. 5069-5080
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Volume
105
Issue
D4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
5069 - 5080
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Assessment of the effects of ozone depletion on biologically effective sola r UV at ground level has been greatly advanced through the use of remote se nsing data. Satellite data on atmospheric properties allow the construction of geographically distributed surface UV radiation maps based on radiative transfer calculations. In this respect, clouds play a dominant but rather complex role. We compared the reduction of daily UV doses due to clouds, as derived from satellite cloud data, with the reduction derived from routine ground-based measurements of global solar radiation (i.e., broadband total solar irradiances with wavelengths between 0.3 and 2.8 mu m). An empirical relationship is used to link the reduction due to clouds of global solar r adiation and UV radiation. The abundance of global solar radiation measurem ents (data from over 125 stations in 30 satellite grid cells) for the Europ ean region ensured a sound basis for the data analysis for the period consi dered (May, June, and July of 1990, 1991, and 1992). Approximately 6500 dai ly UV-reduction factors, defined as the ratio of daily UV doses calculated with and without clouds, were thus obtained applying both methods. The dail y UV-reduction factors (and 10-day averaged UV reduction factors) from the two independent sources correlated well, with r(2) = 0.83 (r(2) = 0.89), an d had a standard deviation of 0.06 (0.03). Over 90% of the satellite-derive d results agreed within a range of +/-0.14 (+/-0.07) with the ground-based measurement-derived results. We evaluated sources of uncertainty related to spatial and temporal resolution, and optical properties, and estimated the ir consequences and range. Among these different sources the largest uncert ainties are caused by the sampling error, i.e., grid-cell average versus st ation average, which is on average 0.10 for daily UV-reduction factors. Inf ormation on the atmospheric optical properties during the measurements may reduce the stated range of uncertainty from +/-0.14 to +/-0.07. The variati on of the measurements from station to station is then the limiting factor. We concluded that the reduction of daily UV based on satellite-derived clo ud cover and cloud optical thickness relates well with the UV reduction due to clouds derived from ground-based global solar radiation measurements.