In 1997, a court in Cyprus jailed Pavlos Georgiou for fifteen months for kn
owingly infecting a British woman, Janet Pink, with HIV-1 through unprotect
ed sexual intercourse. Pink met Georgiou in January 1994 whilst on holiday.
She discovered that she had contracted the virus from him in October 1994
but continued the relationship until July 1996 when she developed AIDS. She
returned to the UK for treatment and reported Georgiou to the Cypriot auth
orities.(1)
There have been a number of legal cases involving deliberate transmission o
f HIV, but most have involved forced exposure to infected bodily fluids for
example, rape or biting, and have been dealt with using the existing legis
lation for rape or assault. While it is often difficult to prove responsibi
lity far transmission in cases of forced exposure to HIV, it is even more c
ontentious in cases like those of Janet Pink where an individual has consen
ted to sex but claims that he/she was not forewarned of his/her partner's H
IV-positive status. At present there is no specific criminal offence of hav
ing unprotected sexual intercourse without disclosing one's HIV-positive st
atus but a prosecution could possibly be brought under any one of a number
of existing offences.(2) Perhaps a change of policy needs to be considered.
The Home Office has issued a consultation document which outlines a propos
al that will allow the criminalisation of intentional transmission of disea
ses, like HIV, that are likely to cause serious harm. This revised legislat
ion would cover all other potentially fatal diseases (including salmonella
and legionnaire's disease, for instance) but seems primarily to be targeted
at HIV transmission. Should transmission of HIV through consensual sex, wi
thout the HIV-positive status of the individual being disclosed, be art off
ence? This question and that of whether there is a moral obligation to disc
lose a positive HIV status prior to having a sexual relationship is the sub
ject of this paper.