A collected volume on The Peasantries of Europe: From the Fourteenth to the
Eighteenth Centuries, edited by Tom Scott, is reviewed. It contains an Int
roduction by Scott; papers on France (Jonathan Dewald and Liana Vardi), Ibe
ria (Teofilo F. Ruiz), Italy (S.R. Epstein), Western Germany (Thomas Robish
eaux), East-Elbian Germany and Poland (william W. Hagen), the Austrian Empi
re (Hermann Rebel), Russia (Edgar Melton), the Ottoman Empire (Fikret Adani
r), Scandinavia (David Gaunt) and England (Richard M. Smith); and a conclud
ing essay (John Langton). The volume's scope and the claims made on its beh
alf, as a work of major historiographic importance, are notes; the theoreti
cal/methodological intent and the authors' remit identified; and the indivi
dual papers considered critically. It provides a useful depiction of the sp
ecificities of a wide range of European peasantries. It is, however, in sev
eral ways, analytically defective. This is so, it is argued, inasmuch as th
e authors' quest for diversity turns out to be unhelpful; it is structured
by an inadequate political economy, seen in an absence, or deficient treatm
ent, of various crucial themes - most notably sharecropping, differential l
and productivity, social differentiation, and the state; and the volume has
major shortcomings in terms of comparative history (including a curious ne
glect of the influential work of Robert Brenner).