This paper asks why it is so difficult to research the lives and experience
s of urban women in Gwelo, an industrial town in Southern Rhodesia. It used
to be said that African migrant workers in urban areas and mine compounds
were predominantly male, and that women were left behind, unwaged, as an in
visible 'rural subsidy' on migrant wages. The evidence from the first few d
ecades of white occupation supported this interpretation. However, historia
ns today acknowledge the presence of women in towns and on mine compounds f
rom an early stage of white occupation and urbanization. Given the paucity
of evidence, is this simply a reflection of feminist political correctness?
Were women only present in such insignificant numbers as to have left litt
le trace? Or is it rather something about towns which makes it harder to se
e women in the historical record? This paper demonstrates that there is evi
dence that women played an active role in the development of the new town.
African women appear in court records and in the memories of old people. Wh
ite women appear occasionally in newspapers, in old photographs and reminis
cences, and again, in court records. They were there and probably reasonabl
y visible to the eye; but they have a very low profile in the archival reco
rd. The paper draws two conclusions: first that white women's experiences w
ere obscured in the record because the reality of their experiences was at
odds with the icon of a rural 'white womanhood' which was important for ear
ly white nation-building; and second, that African women's presence in town
was obscured by African men claiming urban public spaces as 'male space'.
Although women were there, they were nor acknowledged as part of the urban
environment and so we find it hard to see them now.