We reconsider the decoherent histories approach to quantum mechanics and an
alyze some problems related to its interpretation which we believe have not
been adequately clarified by its proponents. We put forward some assumptio
ns which. in our opinion, are necessary ibr a realistic interpretation of t
he probabilities that the formalism attaches to decoherent histories. We pr
ove that such assumptions, unless one limits the set of the decoherent fami
lies which can be taken into account. lead to a logical contradiction The l
ine of reasoning we follow is conceptually different from other arguments w
hich have been presented and which have been rejected by the supporters of
the decoherent histories approach. The conclusion is that the decoherent hi
stories approach, to be considered as an interesting realistic alternative
to the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics, requires the identific
ation of a mathematically precise criterion to characterize an appropriate
set of decoherent families which does not give rise to any problem.