C. Pauli-magnus et al., Naltrexone does not relieve uremic pruritus: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, J AM S NEPH, 11(3), 2000, pp. 514-519
Improvement of uremic pruritus was reported under short-term administration
of the mu-receptor antagonists naltrexone and naloxone. The aim of the pre
sent study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of the oral mu-receptor a
ntagonist naltrexone during a 4-wk treatment period in patients on hemodial
ysis and peritoneal dialysis. A placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover
study of uremic patients with persistent, treatment-resistant pruritus was
performed. Of 422 patients screened between December 1997 and June 1998, 93
suffered from pruritus and 23 were eligible for the study. Patients were s
tarted either with a 4-wk naltrexone sequence (50 mg/d) or matched placebo.
This was followed by a 7-d washout, and patients continued with a 4-wk seq
uence of the alternate medication. Pruritus intensity was scored daily by a
visual analogue scale (VAS) and weekly by a detailed score assessing scrat
ching activity, distribution of pruritus, and frequency of pruritus-related
sleep disturbance. Sixteen of 23 patients completed the study. During the
naltrexone period, pruritus decreased by 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI
], 18.7 to 39.6) on the VAS and by 17.6% (95% CI, 4.2 to 31.1) on the detai
led score. In comparison, pruritus decreased by 16.9% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.9)
on the VAS and by 22.3% (95% CI, 9.3 to 35.2) on the detailed score during
the placebo period. The difference between the naltrexone and the placebo
treatment period was not statistically significant. Nine of 23 patients com
plained of gastrointestinal disturbances during the naltrexone period compa
red with only one of 23 patients during the placebo period (P < 0.05). Thes
e results show that treatment of uremic pruritus with naltrexone is ineffec
tive. In addition, a high incidence of adverse effects was observed during
treatment with naltrexone.