Cone synaptic terminals couple electrically to their neighbors. This reduce
s the amplitude of temporally uncorrelated voltage differences between neig
hbors. For an achromatic stimulus coarser than the cone mosaic, the uncorre
lated voltage difference between neighbors represents mostly noise; so nois
e is reduced more than the signal. Here coupling improves signal-to-noise r
atio and enhances contrast sensitivity. But for a chromatic stimulus the un
correlated voltage difference between neighbors of different spectral type
represents mostly signal; so signal would be reduced more than the noise. T
his cost of cone coupling to encoding chromatic signals was evaluated using
a compartmental model of the foveal cone array. When cones sensitive to mi
ddle (M) and long (L) wavelengths alternated regularly, and the conductance
between a cone and all of its immediate neighbors was 1000 pS (similar to
2 connexons/cone pair), coupling reduced the difference between the L and M
action spectra by nearly fivefold, from about 38% to 8%. However, L and M
cones distribute randomly in the mosaic, forming small patches of like type
, and within a patch the responses to a chromatic stimulus are correlated.
In such a mosaic, coupling still reduced the difference between the I, and
M action spectra, but only by 2.4-fold, to about 18%. This result is indepe
ndent of the L/M ratio. Thus "patchiness" of the L/M mosaic allows cone cou
pling to improve achromatic contrast sensitivity while minimizing the cost
to chromatic sensitivity. (C) 2000 Optical Society of America [S0740-3232(0
0)02103-7].